[Fsf-friends] Queries about FLOSS...
Mahesh T. Pai
paivakil@vsnl.net
Tue Mar 30 08:22:45 IST 2004
Frederick Noronha (FN) said on Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:24:34PM +0530,:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, mayur m wrote:
> > 1) There are so many versions of linux so how do the
Yes. If you check ftp.kernel.org, you will find several versions,
starting from pre 1.00 to 2.6.6 pre-release.
Take your pick. :-)
> > common people come to know what is best for them.
Does a software student require same things a lawyer like me needs??
Does a sysadmin require same software as a journalist?? No????
Which is why we have different distros.
And to help me and you to choose between distros, we have friends and
gurus. If you do not have access to a friend / guru who will do this
free of cost (and law permits him to do it), you certainly can hire a
consultant ( and law permits this too). Neither the friend/guru nor
consultant option is available in the non-free world.
> > 2)in linux community is there someone controls the development
His name is Linus Torvalds. He controls the kernel development
process.
> > and expansion of the open source freesoftware(someone who is the
> > pathfinder).if there isnt anyone dont u think ultimately
> > there will be fragmentation of linux like it happened in the past
> > with Unix.
There are several other persons working on the Kernel ... Andrea
Arcangeli, Andrew Morton, Alan Cox, ... (that is only the `A's ...)
Where is the fragmentation???
Seriously, we have well defined standards (think of the filesystem
hierarchy standards, LSB, the zillion RFCs, etc) and if you write code
compliant with these standards, every app. will be a drop-in
substitute for another.
> > Secondly why is there no democratic body at the core
It *IS* democratic. See above.
If you meant the whole operating system and not the kernel, start from
www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu.html.
Also see debian.org.
> > A democratic body if formed would not only help development of
> > software and oversee it but at the
See above.
> > 3)The companies supporting free software&open source are
> > supporting with what motives is quite questionable. .Is it to
> > bring down a monopoly or make their own (this refers to the
> > current battle between big blue & Redmond giant.and the takeover
> > of SUSE Linux by IBM and NOVELL)
It is not possible to have monopoly over code if you put it under a
strong copyleft license. Why bother with the corporates??
> > 4)After the SCO case
Uhhh?? *after*?? Is it over??? <grin>
For best info on the SCO v. IBM, SCO v. Novell, SCO v. RH, see
http://www.groklaw.net/
> > I think developers who develop open source software and
> > especially linux must come together ,
Ummm ... hang around awhile .... and you will eat these words ... <grin>
Especially after visiting gnu.org and groklaw.
> > sit and decide that further such an event does not happen.(it
> > may not affect linux and open source community but it does drive
> > out companies who are ready to embrace linux by bringing
> > suspicion in their minds.)
There is already one project which does this. Read more at
www.gnu.org/copyleft/why-assign.html
> > 5) Why is everyone trying to make a new package (distribution) of
> > linux by adding or deleting some applications and some core
> > requirements .
Coz. people's requirements vary. It is result of what marketing MBAs
call FREEDOM OF CHOICE.
> > then why develop so many players instead come togethar and
> > develop a music player which is absolutely mind boggling in terms
> > of features. Wouldnt this be more preffered?
I want a music player which just plays music when I am alone. I want
another which a beautifully useless interface while demo'ing my
desktop. I want one to go with X-windows. Another to run in console.
Yet another to invoke from GNU Emacs. Obviously, one-size-fits-all
will not fit me. How will it fit everybody???
> > (Opensourcelover@yahoo.com)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Umm..
Ya know what happened to a company called DaimlerChrysler??
Long time back, they purchased a (few) license(s) to an OS called
Unix. They (DC) got the binaries. They got the source. They got the
right to modify the source. They got the right to deploy unlimited
copies, modified or not. IMHO, this license qualifies as an
Opensource license.
Then DC decided Unix was not for them. They stopped using it (Unix,
that is).
They are now being sued by a company called SCO -- on basis of that
old license for Unix, which DC does not use any more. The suit is for
not disclosing information about the software DC uses in-house.
`opensource'??? `viral??'
--
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Mahesh T. Pai, LL.M.,
'NANDINI', S. R. M. Road,
Ernakulam, Cochin-682018,
Kerala, India.
http://paivakil.port5.com
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
More information about the Fsf-friends
mailing list