[Fsf-friends] Indian Linux users cant see constitution in Hindi
Sandip Bhattacharya
sandip@lug-delhi.org
Thu Dec 2 09:07:15 IST 2004
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 08:16 +0530, Ramanraj K wrote:
> >
> >Proprietary software have almost never been the only viable option at
> >any time in the history of web. Let me explain: .....
> >
> Earlier, there was a discussion about http://osf.nic.in/ here, and there
> was no real consensus as to the acceptable "standard". That apart,
> questions like, is it all right to use java, javascript, frames, etc.
> arise. You may contend that NIC/GoI sites fall short of your standards,
> but is there any consensus about the ideal normative standards that any
> public body should follow?
Fall short of my standards? I am talking about web standards defined
here: http://www.w3c.org/ for HTML/DOM/CSS,
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm
for Javascript. And there is nothing specific to public bodies. All
websites should be trying to comply with these standards as much as
possible.
> > To be honest, I am a bit prejudiced against premier government
> >organizations like NIC or CDAC. I feel really sad and frustrated that
> >far from being leaders in bringing Free software to the people, these
> >organizations have thrived on either using or creating proprietary
> >software all these years ... and now they are just playing catch up to
> >the free software activity in India.
> >
>
> Please avoid having prejudices against *anyone*. HTH ;)
>
:) I agree with you heartily there. I am also hoping that these
organisations do something really worthwhile to redeem themselves to the
Free Software community in India.
> Meanwhile, there is nothing in the way to patch up existing content, to
> make it usable by us. We volunteer all the time, and helping with
> writing patches for GOI sites, may help. It may take less time than
> writing representations. The only way to move forward and bring in
> changes is by sending representations [and patches, if possible], and
> documenting them well, to measure progress. If, inspite of
You know, that last part was a *great* idea. Instead of just maintaining
a passive list, we should be taking up each of these entries in the
blacklist and proactively try to correct them. I am planning to compile
a definitive list of all these non-compliant sites, and then make a
representation to NIC with my LUG, and document what all is happening.
- Sandip
--
Sandip Bhattacharya * Puroga Technologies * sandip@puroga.com
Work: http://www.puroga.com * Home: http://www.sandipb.net
PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3
Harrison's Postulate:
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
More information about the Fsf-friends
mailing list